“Which is lawful?”
“On another Sabbath Jesus went into the synagogue and was teaching, and a man was there whose right hand was shriveled. The scribes and the Pharisees watched Him closely to see if He would heal on the Sabbath, so that they might find grounds to accuse Him. But Jesus knew what they were thinking and said to the man with the shriveled hand, “Get up and stand in the middle.” So, he got up and stood there. Then Jesus said to them, “I ask you, which is lawful on the Sabbath: to do good or to do evil, to save life or to kill?” He looked around at them all, and then said to the man, “Stretch out your hand.” He did so, and his hand was restored. But they were furious and discussed with one another what they might do to Jesus’ (Luke 6:6–11).
While meditating on the words, I desire to receive the instruction given
as I meditate on this passage:
(1) After reading today’s passage, Luke 6:6–11, I
also read Matthew 12:9–14 and Mark 3:1–6, and I meditate on them together,
dividing my thoughts into several parts:
(a) First, on “another Sabbath” (different from the
“Sabbath” spoken of in Luke 6:1), Jesus left the “grainfields” (“fields of
grain” in Luke 6:1; Mark 2:23) and entered the Jewish synagogue (“their
synagogue,” Mt. 12:9) at “that place” (v. 9), and was teaching. There was a man there whose right hand was
withered (Lk. 6:6).
(i)
When I
meditate on the fact that Jesus entered the synagogue on the Sabbath and
carried out His ministry of teaching, I am reminded of several passages where
the apostle Paul, following Jesus’ example, also entered synagogues to preach
the Word and the gospel (e.g., Acts 13:14; 14:1; 17:2; 18:4; 19:8–9). Among these, I became particularly interested
in the words describing how Paul, in Ephesus, entered the synagogue and spoke
boldly for three months, reasoning and persuading concerning the kingdom of
God.
·
In Acts
18:19–21, Paul, near the end of his second missionary journey and just before
going up to Jerusalem, visited Ephesus. There
he proclaimed the Word, and the Jews responded very positively, asking him to
stay longer. Paul declined, promising
that he would return if God allowed. In
Acts 19:1, we see that God did indeed grant that opportunity, and Paul returned
to Ephesus. There Paul taught about the
kingdom of God for three months in the synagogue (v. 8).
-
But some
became hardened and disobedient, publicly speaking evil of “the Way” (v. 9). They did not believe the message Paul
proclaimed, but instead hardened their hearts. This showed that their spiritual condition had
become irrecoverably stubborn and unbelieving. From this hardened state they moved into
active hostility, publicly slandering Paul’s gospel before the people.
n So, Paul withdrew the disciples and taught daily
for two years in the lecture hall of Tyrannus (v. 10). A Western manuscript states that Paul taught
there from the fifth hour to the tenth hour (11 a.m. – 4 p.m.) (Metzger). This reflects the cultural custom of Asia
Minor, where people rested or napped during the heat of the day. Both Jews and Gentiles used this rest period
to learn God’s Word from Paul (Sang-sub Yoo). As a result, all who lived in Asia—both Jews
and Greeks—heard the Word of the Lord (v. 10). “Asia” here refers to the region along the
western coast of the Anatolian peninsula, bounded by Bithynia to the north,
Galatia to the east, and Lycia to the south (J. A. Harrill). Ephesus alone had a population approaching
250,000, and including the surrounding areas, the total number would have been
much larger. This suggests how many
people heard God’s Word in the Tyrannus lecture hall (Yoo).
# Thus,
I am reminded again that even while the Word spreads widely and many receive
the gospel and accept Jesus as Savior and Lord, others harden their hearts,
refuse to obey God’s Word, and attack the messenger.
·
In today’s
passage (Lk. 6:6–11), while Jesus was teaching in the synagogue, the scribes
and Pharisees were watching to find grounds to accuse Him, looking to see
whether He would heal on the Sabbath (v. 7).
-
Thus, in the
ministry of teaching God’s Word, there can be positive spiritual fruit, but
there can also be negative fruit instigated by Satan.
n In Acts, when Peter, filled with the Holy
Spirit, preached God’s Word, many were “pierced to the heart,” asking, “What
shall we do?” (Acts 2:37), and about 3,000 repented, were baptized, and
received forgiveness (v. 38). But when Stephen preached, some were also “cut to
the heart,” yet they gnashed their teeth, and ultimately stoned him to death
(Acts 7:54, 58).
# Therefore,
in the ministry of the Word, some who hear repent of their sins, but others
become angry and resentful, killing the messenger with their tongues (cf. 1 Jn.
3:15).
(ii)
Continuing
my meditation on Luke 6:6, I found it meaningful that Jesus met the man with
the shriveled right hand in the synagogue on the Sabbath.
·
I do not
consider this meeting accidental. I believe that within God’s sovereignty,
Jesus and that man with the withered hand met in the synagogue at that exact
time.
-
I wish to
share part of a meditation I wrote on October 7, 2025, titled “The Encounters
God Gives Us in Life Are Never Accidental!”: “Among the encounters given in the
journey of our lives, some seem good from our perspective and bring us
refreshment, joy, and benefit. Others
seem unpleasant, causing difficulty and pain, appearing to bring no benefit at
all. How does God view all these
encounters? I personally believe that
none of our encounters in life are accidental, but that all come under God’s
sovereignty. God permits every
encounter, and in each of them there is surely God’s purpose. Though we may not understand that purpose at
the moment, our encounters lie within God’s will. When we faithfully face our encounters in the
Lord, God unfolds His purpose and allows us to see His glory.”
(b) Second, the scribes and Pharisees sought grounds
to accuse Jesus and watched Him closely to see whether He would heal the man
with the withered right hand on the Sabbath (Lk. 6:7; Mk. 3:2). They then
asked, “Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath?” (Mt. 12:10).
(i)
While
meditating on this, I recalled something I wrote recently: “Love is not looking
for faults in others; rather, it is seeking to cover them.” This came to mind because the scribes and
Pharisees were watching to find fault, wrongdoing, or what they considered
“sin” in Jesus so that they could accuse Him.
·
The
Scripture says they “watched” Jesus to see whether He would heal (Lk. 6:7), or
“kept watching” Him (Mk. 3:2). The word
“watched” (“παρετήρουν,” paretēroun) is the imperfect of paratēreō, meaning “to
watch,” “observe closely,” indicating continuous observation with hostile
intent, as they stayed close to Jesus looking for something to charge Him with
(cf. Lk. 14:1; 20:20) (Hochma).
-
This word
demonstrates how an unrighteous heart focuses not on learning, but on accusing
(Lk. 20:20; Acts 9:24). The religious
leaders and persecutors of that day followed Jesus and His servants like
shadows, attempting to trap them legally or politically.
n All three Sabbath-healing contexts (Lk. 6:7; Mk.
3:2; Lk. 14:1) highlight the tension between grace and hardened religiosity. While Christ extends mercy, the law-keepers
wield the law as a weapon. Thus, the
word paratēreō (“to watch closely”) symbolizes a heart that fails to see that
the Messiah is standing before them.
# In
Galatians 4:10, paratēreō shifts from watching a person to the scrupulous
observance of regulations. Paul grieves that believers have returned to “weak
and miserable principles” (Gal. 4:9). The same word used to describe Pharisaic
surveillance now describes the Galatians’ self-imposed bondage—exposing
legalism as a spiritual snare.
(ii)
The scribes
and Pharisees asked, “Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath?” intending to trap
Jesus. If He healed, they would accuse
Him of breaking Sabbath laws; if He refused to heal, they could accuse Him of
violating His own teaching that mercy is greater than sacrifice. They crafted this question to put Jesus in an
inescapable dilemma, forcing Him into either hypocrisy or inconsistency (Hochma).
(c) Third, Jesus, knowing their thoughts, told the
man with the withered hand, “Get up and stand in the middle,” and he came
forward (Lk. 6:8; Mk. 3:3). Jesus then
asked, “Which is lawful on the Sabbath: to do good or to do evil, to save life
or to kill?” (Lk. 6:9). But they
remained silent (Mk. 3:4).
(i)
When I
meditate on “doing good” or “saving life,” I connect this with Matthew
12:11–12: “Jesus said, ‘If any of you has a sheep and it falls into a pit on
the Sabbath, will you not take hold of it and lift it out? How much more
valuable is a man than a sheep! Therefore,
it is lawful to do good on the Sabbath.’”
·
Jesus’ point
is clear: if it is good to rescue an animal on the Sabbath, how much more
should one rescue a human being made in God’s image? Thus, Jesus answers their question (“Is it
lawful to heal on the Sabbath?”) by declaring, “It is lawful to do good on the
Sabbath” (v. 12). Healing on the Sabbath
is doing good, and therefore right.
-
But the
scribes and Pharisees, though willing to rescue a sheep, had no desire to show
mercy to a man with a withered hand. Instead, they used him as a tool for their
political purpose of accusing Jesus. Jesus
argues that if acts of mercy toward an animal are allowed, then mercy toward a
human being is far more righteous and proper (Hochma).
n Jesus’ concern is centered on whether the
Sabbath exists to do good or to do evil. “Good” here refers to showing mercy to the
afflicted. This connects to verse 7,
where Jesus declared the disciples innocent—both the disciples plucking grain
and Jesus healing the man are declared good by the Lord of the Sabbath Himself
(Hochma).
(d) Fourth, Jesus, grieved at the hardness of their
hearts, looked around at them in anger (Mk. 3:5) and said to the man, “Stretch
out your hand.” He stretched it out, and
it was completely restored like the other hand (Mt. 12:13).
(i)
Their
“hardness of heart” refers to a state as rigid as marble—so hardened that they
could neither accept Jesus’ words nor act rightly (Hochma).
·
The word
translated “grieved” (συλλυπούμενος) is a compound verb emphasizing that Jesus’
sorrow was not mere sympathy but a sorrow experienced “with” or “alongside” the
people before Him. Though the Pharisees
were the direct object of His grief, their suffering, the confusion of the
crowd, and the spiritual blindness of Israel all weighed upon Christ’s heart. This recalls Isaiah 53:3, the “man of
sorrows,” who bore not only sin but also the emotional burden of the people (Internet).
-
Jesus was
not only sorrowful but also angry—an expression of righteous indignation toward
their hardened hearts (Internet).
n Mark records both grief and anger to show Jesus’
holy love—a love that refuses to accept hardened hearts, yet longs deeply for
their restoration (Internet).
(ii)
Jesus healed
the man solely by His spoken word. His withered right hand became whole like
the other hand.
·
This “word”
of Jesus is the same power by which He created the universe in the beginning
(e.g., Genesis 1:3: “God said, ‘Let there be light,’ and there was light”)—the
same divine power expressed in John 1:1–3 (Hochma).
-
This
reminded me of a meditation I wrote on October 26, 2012, titled “A Faith that
Even Amazed and Was Praised by Jesus”, based on Luke 7:9. I share a portion:
n “Third, the faith that amazed Jesus transcended
time and space. In Luke 7:7 the centurion said, ‘… but say the word, and my
servant will be healed.’ This Roman
centurion believed that Jesus’ word alone—spoken from a distance—could heal his
dying servant. What astonishing faith! He believed in the power of the God who
created heaven and earth by His word. While most people wanted Jesus to touch them
or lay hands on them, the centurion believed that Jesus’ spoken word alone was
enough. Do you not desire such faith—a
faith that transcends time and distance?”
·
That the
withered hand “was restored and became whole” (Matt. 12:13) confirms that Jesus
has the power to make a person whole—body and soul (Hochma).
-
The Lord of
the Sabbath had already confirmed His authority to forgive sins through the
grainfield incident (Lk. 6:1–5) (Hochma).
(e) Fifth and finally, when Jesus healed the man’s
withered right hand by the power of His word, the Pharisees were filled with
rage (Lk. 6:11) and immediately went out to conspire with the Herodians about
how they might kill Jesus (Mk. 3:6; cf. Mt. 12:14; Lk. 6:11).
(i)
Their rage
(Lk. 6:11) indicates that they lost all sense and reason—becoming like madmen,
rushing ahead in blind fury (Hochma).
·
They left
the synagogue (because, having condemned Jesus as a Sabbath-breaker, they did
not even want to remain in the same building with Him) and plotted evil—unlike
Jesus, who had done good and saved life on the Sabbath. They united with the Herodians to devise a
plan to kill Him (Hochma).
-
They
condemned Jesus as a Sabbath violator (Exod. 31:14) and, together with a
secular political group (the Herodians), seriously discussed how they might
destroy Him. This is the inevitable
result when religion joins forces with politics (Hochma).
n While meditating on this, I recalled Luke 23:12:
“Herod and Pilate, who had previously been enemies, became close friends that
day.” Considering how Herod (the son of
the Herod who ruled when Jesus was born) and Pilate (a Roman governor) became
friends over their treatment of Jesus, Psalm 2:2 comes to mind: “The kings of
the earth rise up and the rulers band together against the LORD and against His
Anointed.” Though both Herod and Pilate
knew Jesus was innocent, Herod mocked Him and sent Him back to Pilate dressed
in a splendid robe (Lk. 23:11), and Pilate, though three times declaring Jesus
innocent (vv. 14, 15, 22), finally surrendered Him to be crucified because the
crowd kept shouting insistently until their voices prevailed (vv. 23–25).
댓글
댓글 쓰기