기본 콘텐츠로 건너뛰기

바울의 마지막 문안 인사 (11)

바울의 마지막 문안 인사 (11)       두기고와 오네시모의 두 번째 공통점은 그들은 신실한 사람들이었습니다 ( 골 4:7, 9).   흥미로운 점은 바울은 골로새 교 회 성도들에게 마지막 문안 인사를 하면서 신실한 사람들인 두기고와 오네시모를 언급하였는데 , 시작 인사를 보면 그는 골로새에 있는 성도들 “ 곧 그리스도 안에서 신실한 형제들 ” (1:2) 하고 언급했을 뿐만 아니라 에바브라는 그들을 위한 “ 그리스도의 신실한 일꾼 ”(7 절 ) 이라고 말했다는 것입니다 .   여기 골로새서 1 장 2 절에서 “신실한 형제들”이란 말을 현대인의 성경은 “그리스도를 믿는 형제들”이라고 번역을 했 는 데 여기서 “신실한 형제들”이란 예수 그리스도를 계속해 서 신실하게 믿는 형제들입니다 .   “신실한 형제들”이란 (1) 믿음이 충만한 자들이요 (full of faith), (2) 신뢰하는 사람들 (trustful) 이요 , 또한 신뢰할 만한 사람들 (trustworthy) 로서 (3) 그리스도에게 충성된 자들 (loyal to Christ) 입니다 (KJV 성경 주석 ). “그리스도 안에서 신실한 형제들”은 그리스도에게 충성된 자들이요 예수 그리스도의 충성된 증인들 입니다 ( 계 1:5). 그들은 흠 없이 정직하게 주님을 따르며 ( 시 101:6), 지극히 작은 것에도 충성하며 ( 눅 16:10), 죽도록 충성하여 ( 계 2:10) 주님 앞에서 설 때에 “잘하였다 착한 종이여 네가 지극히 작은 것에 충성하였”다는 주님의 칭찬 ( 눅 19:17) 과 더불어 주님께로부터 생명의 면류관을 받을 사람들입니다 ( 계 2:10).      

Tim Keller Sparks Twitter Debate Over Political Comments

Tim Keller Sparks Twitter Debate Over Political Comments

Tim Keller

Keller Tweets About Christians and the Freedom of Conscience in Politics:

The Bible binds my conscience to care for the poor, but it does not tell me the best practical way to do it. Any particular strategy (high taxes and government services vs low taxes and private charity) may be good and wise and may even be somewhat inferred from other things the Bible teaches, but they are not directly commanded and therefore we cannot insist that all Christians, as a matter of conscience, follow one or the other. The Bible binds my conscience to love the immigrant–but it doesn’t tell me how many legal immigrants to admit to the U.S. every year. It does not exactly prescribe immigration policy. The current political parties offer a potpourri of different positions on these and many other topics, most of which, as just noted, the Bible does not speak to directly. This means when it comes to taking political positions, voting, determining alliances and political involvement, the Christian has liberty of conscience. Christians cannot say to other Christians ‘no Christian can vote for…’ or ‘every Christian must vote for…unless you can find a Biblical command to that effect.‘ “

After many comments that ranged all over the spectrum, Keller posted one last comment to his series of Tweets that read, “Some folks are missing the point of this thread. The Bible tells me that abortion is a sin and great evil, but it doesn’t tell me the best way to decrease or end abortion in this country, nor which policies are most effective.”

In his “How Do Christians Fit Into the Two-Party System? They Don’t,” Keller wrote, loving our neighbors is the reason a Christian should be involved politically. He gave examples of helping better public schools, improving the justice system, and ending racial segregation as some of the things Christians should continue to be involved with. Keller said that although a Christian can register under a specific party and participate under that party, one should “not identify the Christian church or faith with a political party as the only Christian one.”

Keller Gives Reasons Not to Affiliate the Christian Church With a Political Party

Identifying the church with a particular party may impress upon a non-believer that to be converted “they need not only to believe in Jesus but also to become members of the (fill in the blank) Party.” The other reason Keller gave was “most political positions are not matters of biblical command but of practical wisdom.”

Keller elaborated, “This does not mean that the church can never speak on social, economic and political realities, because the Bible often does.” Quoting Matthew 22:39, he wrote that as a Christian it isn’t an option to not speak out against moral requirements: “Racism is a sin, violating the second of the two great commandments of Jesus, to ‘love your neighbor.’ The biblical commands to lift up the poor and to defend the rights of the oppressed are moral imperatives for believers.”

He asked questions about how one should help the poor, “Should we shrink government and let private capital markets allocate resources,” or is it better that “we expand the government and give the state more of the power to redistribute wealth?” Keller proposed the question, “Is the right path one of the many possibilities in between?” The point he expressed is that the Bible doesn’t give the exact answer to these questions in every situation."

댓글