기본 콘텐츠로 건너뛰기

바울의 마지막 문안 인사 (30)

바울의 마지막 문안 인사 (30)       바울 은 마지막 문안 인사에서 이렇게 말씀했습니다 : “아킵보에게 이르기를 주 안에서 받은 직분을 삼가 이루라고 하라” ( 골 4:17).   아킵보는 자신의 직분을 충분히 입증하라는 말씀 입니다 .   신약성경에 나타난 주요 직분으로는 목사 , 장로 , 집사 등이 있습니다 .   직분자들은 자신의 직분을 충분히 입증하기 위해선 (1) 그리스도 예수님께 감사해야 합니다 .   디모데전서 1 장 12 절입니다 : “나에게 힘을 주신 우리 주 그리스도 예수님께 내가 감사하는 것은 나를 충성스러운 사람으로 여겨 나에게 직분을 맡겨 주셨기 때문입니다 . ”   바울은 자신이 예수 그리스도를 믿지 않았을 때에 모르고 하나님을 모독하고 성도들을 핍박하던 난폭한 사람이었는데 하나님께서 자신을 불쌍히 여겨 주시사 회심케하셨을 뿐만 아니라 사명을 주시사 이방인의 사도로 세우셨기에 예수님께 감사했습니다 . (2) 은혜의식 속에서 더 많이 수고해야 합니다 .   고린도전서 15 장 8-10 절입니다 : “맨 나중에는 부족하기 짝이 없는 내게도 나타나셨습니다 .   나는 사도들 중에 가장 보잘것없는 사람이며 하나님의 교회를 박해했기 때문에 사도라고 불릴 자격마저 없습니다 .   그러나 오늘날 내가 이렇게 된 것은 하나님의 은혜로 된 것이며 내게 주신 그분의 은혜가 헛되지 않아 내가 다른 모든 사도들보다 더 많이 일했습니다 .   그렇지만 그것은 내가 한 것이 아니라 나와 함께 하신 하나님의 은혜였습니다 . ”   그래서 그는 은혜 의식 속에서 다른 모든 사도들보다 더 많이 일을 했습니다 .   우리도 그 리 해야 합니다 .

Tim Keller Sparks Twitter Debate Over Political Comments

Tim Keller Sparks Twitter Debate Over Political Comments

Tim Keller

Keller Tweets About Christians and the Freedom of Conscience in Politics:

“The Bible binds my conscience to care for the poor, but it does not tell me the best practical way to do it. Any particular strategy (high taxes and government services vs low taxes and private charity) may be good and wise and may even be somewhat inferred from other things the Bible teaches, but they are not directly commanded and therefore we cannot insist that all Christians, as a matter of conscience, follow one or the other. The Bible binds my conscience to love the immigrant–but it doesn’t tell me how many legal immigrants to admit to the U.S. every year. It does not exactly prescribe immigration policy. The current political parties offer a potpourri of different positions on these and many other topics, most of which, as just noted, the Bible does not speak to directly. This means when it comes to taking political positions, voting, determining alliances and political involvement, the Christian has liberty of conscience. Christians cannot say to other Christians ‘no Christian can vote for…’ or ‘every Christian must vote for…unless you can find a Biblical command to that effect.‘ “

After many comments that ranged all over the spectrum, Keller posted one last comment to his series of Tweets that read, “Some folks are missing the point of this thread. The Bible tells me that abortion is a sin and great evil, but it doesn’t tell me the best way to decrease or end abortion in this country, nor which policies are most effective.”

In his “How Do Christians Fit Into the Two-Party System? They Don’t,” Keller wrote, loving our neighbors is the reason a Christian should be involved politically. He gave examples of helping better public schools, improving the justice system, and ending racial segregation as some of the things Christians should continue to be involved with. Keller said that although a Christian can register under a specific party and participate under that party, one should “not identify the Christian church or faith with a political party as the only Christian one.”

Keller Gives Reasons Not to Affiliate the Christian Church With a Political Party

Identifying the church with a particular party may impress upon a non-believer that to be converted “they need not only to believe in Jesus but also to become members of the (fill in the blank) Party.” The other reason Keller gave was “most political positions are not matters of biblical command but of practical wisdom.”

Keller elaborated, “This does not mean that the church can never speak on social, economic and political realities, because the Bible often does.” Quoting Matthew 22:39, he wrote that as a Christian it isn’t an option to not speak out against moral requirements: “Racism is a sin, violating the second of the two great commandments of Jesus, to ‘love your neighbor.’ The biblical commands to lift up the poor and to defend the rights of the oppressed are moral imperatives for believers.”

He asked questions about how one should help the poor, “Should we shrink government and let private capital markets allocate resources,” or is it better that “we expand the government and give the state more of the power to redistribute wealth?” Keller proposed the question, “Is the right path one of the many possibilities in between?” The point he expressed is that the Bible doesn’t give the exact answer to these questions in every situation."

댓글