The only prescription for healing my ignorance and spiritual disappointment is to return to a “Bible-centered faith” and interpret every moment of my life through the “gospel of Jesus Christ.”
The only prescription for healing my ignorance and spiritual
disappointment is to return to a “Bible-centered faith” and interpret every
moment of my life through the “gospel of Jesus Christ.”
“Now behold, two of them were traveling that
same day to a village called Emmaus, which was about twenty-five ri from
Jerusalem. And they talked together
about all these things which had happened. So it was, while they conversed and discussed
together, that Jesus Himself drew near and went with them. But their eyes were restrained, so that they
did not recognize Him. And He said to
them, ‘What kind of conversation is this that you have with one another as you
walk?’ Then the two stood still, looking
sad. And one of them, whose name was
Cleopas, answered and said to Him, ‘Are You the only visitor in Jerusalem who
does not know the things which have happened there in these days?’ And He said to them, ‘What things?’ So they said to Him, ‘The things concerning Jesus
of Nazareth, who was a prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the
people, and how our chief priests and rulers delivered Him to be condemned to
death and crucified Him. But we were
hoping that it was He who was going to redeem Israel. Indeed, besides all this, today is the third
day since these things happened. Moreover, certain women of our company
astonished us. They were at the tomb
early in the morning, and when they did not find His body, they came saying
that they had also seen a vision of angels who said He was alive. And some of those who were with us went to the
tomb and found it just as the women had said; but Him they did not see.’ Then He said to them, ‘O foolish ones, and
slow of heart to believe in all that the prophets have spoken! Was it not necessary for the Christ to suffer
these things and to enter into His glory?’ And beginning with Moses and all the Prophets,
He explained to them in detail the things concerning Himself in all the
Scriptures. Then they drew near to the
village where they were going, and He acted as though He would go farther. But they urged Him strongly, saying, ‘Stay
with us, for it is toward evening, and the day is already far spent.’ And He went in to stay with them. Now it came to pass, as He sat at the table
with them, that He took bread, blessed it, broke it, and gave it to them. Then
their eyes were opened, and they recognized Him; and Jesus disappeared from
their sight. And they said to one
another, ‘Did not our hearts burn within us while He spoke to us on the road
and opened the Scriptures to us?’ So
they rose up that very hour and returned to Jerusalem, and found the eleven and
those who were with them gathered together, saying, ‘The Lord is risen indeed,
and has appeared to Simon!’ And the two
also told what had happened on the road, and how Jesus had become known to them
in the breaking of bread” (Luke 24:13–35).
(1) After reading today’s
passage, Luke 24:13–35, in both the Korean Bible and the Greek Bible, the first
thing I did was look up the lyrics of the gospel song “The Two Disciples on the
Road to Emmaus”: (v. 1) When the two disciples going to the village of Emmaus
were overwhelmed with despair and fear, the Lord Jesus appeared to us and
showed us true hope. (v. 2) The road we
travel through this world is the road to Emmaus; although endless sorrow blocks
the path before us, we believe that the Lord Jesus appears to us and gives us
new hope. After that, I wanted to think
about who those two disciples traveling to the village of Emmaus were and what
they were talking about.
1. Who
were the two disciples?
Cleopas: The
name of the disciple Cleopas is clearly recorded in verse 18. Based on the reference to “Mary the wife of
Clopas” in John 19:25, it is conjectured that he may have been Jesus’ uncle by
marriage or a member of the early group of disciples who faithfully followed
Jesus apart from the Twelve Apostles.
The other
unnamed disciple: The Bible does not mention the name of the second disciple.
Among scholars, various theories exist: the disciple may have been Cleopas’s
wife (making them a married couple), his son (one of the seventy disciples in
Luke 10), or even Luke himself, the author of the Gospel of Luke.
2. What
were they talking about as they walked?
Before and
after Jesus came alongside them, their conversation changed dramatically from
despair to understanding.
Before Jesus Came to Them (A Conversation of Sorrow and Disappointment)
Talking
about what had happened: They were deeply saddened as they talked back and
forth about the shocking event that had taken place in Jerusalem—“the
crucifixion of Jesus” (Lk. 24:14–15).
Their
shattered expectations: They had firmly believed and hoped that Jesus was “the
One who would redeem Israel” (a political and spiritual deliverer), but when He
was seemingly brought to a futile end through execution, they lost all hope (v.
21).
Confusion
over the empty tomb: Some women had reported that the tomb was empty and that
angels had said, “Jesus is alive,” but the disciples could not fully believe
this and were experiencing great confusion between faith and doubt (vv. 22–24).
After Jesus Began Walking with Them
(Understanding the Scriptures)
Although the
risen Jesus came alongside them and walked with them, the disciples’ eyes were
restrained, so they did not recognize Him.
Beginning
with Moses and all the Prophets (the Old Testament Scriptures), Jesus explained
to them one by one the prophecies concerning the Christ, who had to suffer and
then enter into His glory (vv. 26–27).
Later, the
two disciples looked back on this moment and confessed, “Did not our hearts
burn within us while He spoke to us on the road and opened the Scriptures to
us?” (v. 32). Like the lyrics of the Korean
gospel song “The Two Disciples on the Road to Emmaus,” this confession clearly
shows how their hearts, which had been filled with despair, were transformed
into hearts filled with “true hope and burning conviction” (Internet).
(2) Second, I wanted to
understand, from the perspective of these two disciples, the meaning of the
words in Luke 24:21 that, in their conversation about “the crucifixion of
Jesus” that had taken place in Jerusalem before Jesus came to them, they had
hoped [ἠλπίζομεν (ēlpizomen), “we were hoping”] that Jesus was “the One who
would redeem Israel” [ὁ μέλλων λυτροῦσθαι τὸν Ἰσραήλ (ho mellōn lytrousthai ton
Israēl)]. This is because only then can
we understand why they were having a conversation filled with sorrow and
disappointment.
(a) The confession of the two
disciples, “We were hoping that it was He who was going to redeem Israel” (v.
21), contains both the expectations concerning the Messiah that the Jews of
that time held and the depth of the despair they experienced when those expectations
were brutally shattered. By examining
what this confession meant from their perspective through the Greek expressions
and the historical background of their time, we can clearly understand why they
fell into such profound sorrow and disappointment (Internet):
1. The
Hearts of the Two Disciples as Seen Through the Greek
ἠλπίζομεν (ēlpizomen — “we were hoping”):
In terms of
Greek tense, this verb is in the imperfect tense. That is, it conveys the meaning, “Up until a
certain point in the past, we had continually and very earnestly hoped and kept
on hoping.”
But now,
because of the event of the cross, that earnest hope had been completely
interrupted and had become something belonging to the past. Their words are therefore a bitter lament
confessing that what they had so fervently hoped for was now over.
ὁ μέλλων λυτροῦσθαι (ho mellōn lytrousthai —
“the One who was going to redeem”)
Here, “to
redeem” [λυτρόω (lytroō)] means to pay a ransom in order to “set free” or
“deliver” a slave or captive. In the Old
Testament, this word is used primarily in connection with the Exodus event, in
which God delivered Israel from slavery in Egypt.
2. “The
Redemption of Israel” the Disciples Expected (A Political View of the Messiah)
For the Jews
living under the oppression of the Roman Empire at that time, “redemption
(salvation)” was an extremely practical and national concern. The image of the Messiah that the group
including these two disciples expected from Jesus was as follows:
Liberation
from Rome: A ruler who, like King David, would exercise powerful military and
political strength, drive out the Roman army, and bring independence to Israel.
A glorious
King: A hero who would boldly take His seat upon the throne and establish
Israel at the center of the world, just as the crowds had cried out “Hosanna”
when Jesus entered Jerusalem.
3. Why
Did They Fall into Such Profound Sorrow and Disappointment?
Contrary to the disciples’ expectations, Jesus’
final moments appeared utterly powerless.
The most
accursed death: The One whom they had believed to be the King who would save
Israel was nailed to a cross—the cruelest and most shameful punishment of
Rome—and seemingly put to death in vain. According to the words of Deuteronomy (Deut.
21:23), anyone who hangs on a tree is “cursed by God.” Thus, the One whom they
had believed to be the Messiah had died under what appeared to be a curse.
The collapse
of all their hopes: Jesus’ death meant more than simply losing their Teacher. It meant “the collapse of their entire
future—the liberation of Israel”—the dream for which they had staked their
lives. That is why they could do nothing
but leave Jerusalem and trudge toward Emmaus, lamenting in effect, “We had
hoped so deeply… but now everything is over.”
Ultimately,
their sorrow was a form of spiritual disappointment that came because they did
not understand “God’s way of salvation—the suffering Messiah,” but instead
tried to fit Jesus into “their own human standard of salvation—a political
Messiah” (Internet).
(i) Here, I find myself thinking that we modern
Christians, like the two disciples on the road to Emmaus, may also experience
our own kind of spiritual disappointment because we do not understand God’s way
of salvation—or, more fundamentally, God’s salvation itself—and instead try to
fit Jesus into our own human standards of salvation (or our own expectations of
the salvation we want Jesus to provide).
·
Modern
Christians also often experience spiritual disappointment as they walk their
own “road to Emmaus” in their life of faith. Artificial intelligence has
summarized the specific forms of spiritual disappointment that arise from the
gap between what we expect from Jesus and God’s actual way of salvation
(Internet):
a. The “human expectations of salvation” that
modern people place upon Jesus
Just as the
two disciples hoped for political liberation from the Roman Empire, we today
also expect immediate deliverance from the deficiencies and sufferings that
oppress our individual lives.
A Messiah of
prosperity and success: The expectation that if I believe in Jesus, my business
will prosper, my children will get into good universities, and my financial
difficulties will be resolved all at once (a prosperity-oriented view of
salvation).
A
problem-solver and healer: The expectation that the crises of life, physical
illnesses, and conflicts in human relationships should be immediately resolved
at the time I want and in the way I want.
An emotional
comforter: The expectation that faith should always provide me only with peace,
comfort, and positive emotions.
b. The reasons we experience
spiritual disappointment
However,
God’s way of salvation is often different from what we expect. When suffering continues despite our earnest
prayers, or when circumstances become worse, we fall into deep sorrow and doubt
like the two disciples, saying, “We had hoped that this was the One who would
solve my problems.”
Misunderstanding
“God’s silence”: We fall into spiritual depression because we think that God is
not listening to our prayers or that He has abandoned us.
Avoidance of
the cross (suffering): In order to deliver us from sin and death, Jesus chose
the way of “the suffering of the cross,” and He also calls us to take up our
own crosses and follow Him. Yet because
we desire glory without suffering and resurrection without the cross, we become
disappointed when confronted with suffering in real life.
c. The way to overcome spiritual
disappointment
The two
disciples on the road to Emmaus were able to turn away from the road of despair
when Jesus opened the Scriptures to them and broadened their spiritual vision.
A
transformation of expectations: Our eyes are opened when our perspective shifts
from the “micro-level salvation” of having my personal problems solved to the
“macro-level salvation” of God’s eternal rule over my life and His refining
work in me.
Micro-level
salvation is salvation on the personal level in which the practical problems of
“now, here, and me” are resolved, such as healing from disease or overcoming a
financial crisis. By contrast,
macro-level salvation is salvation on the greater scale, in which God
transforms me into one of His people through the sufferings and refining
processes of life and causes me to dwell under His eternal reign.
Like the
disciples on the road to Emmaus, the reason we experience spiritual
disappointment is usually that we are trapped within “micro-level expectations”
that seek to change my immediate circumstances. But when the Lord opens the Scriptures and
broadens our perspective toward “macro-level salvation,” we come to realize
that every refining experience in our lives is a carefully prepared channel of
God’s blessing through which He is bringing us toward completion.
The burning
of the heart: When we embrace the way of Jesus, who prayed, “Not as I will, but
as You will,” the very place of despair instead becomes the place where we
encounter the risen Lord more deeply (Internet).
(ii) Here, as I meditated on
the words “the One who would redeem Israel,” I thought of the words
“redemption, the forgiveness of sins” (Col. 1:14; Eph. 1:7) and “the redemption
of our body” (Rom. 8:23). And I believe
that we Christians should not hold to the concept of “redemption” that the two
disciples on the road to Emmaus had, but rather, by faith in the “redemption,
the forgiveness of sins” that we have already received (which we have already
received through faith in Jesus Christ), we should hope for “the redemption of
our body” (which we will receive in the future when Jesus returns).
a. The redemption we have already
received (Already): “The forgiveness of sins” (Col. 1:14; Eph. 1:7)
Spiritual
meaning: Through the precious blood of Jesus Christ shed on the cross, we have
been liberated (redeemed), once and for all and eternally, from slavery to sin
and death.
Our
attitude: Because this is a historical reality that we have “already received,”
not through our works but solely by grace, we should daily be assured of and
enjoy by faith the joy of this salvation.
b. The redemption we will receive
in the future (Not-yet): “The redemption of our body” (Rom. 8:23)
Spiritual
meaning: Although our souls have received the forgiveness of sins, we still
live on this earth clothed in broken bodies that are subject to disease,
weakness, death, and the temptations of sin. “The redemption of our body” refers to the
final completion of salvation when, at the Lord’s return, our perishable bodies
will be completely transformed to become like the Lord’s glorious resurrection
body.
Our
attitude: Even if our life on this earth is, like the road to Emmaus, a
continuous journey of sorrow and refining, we must patiently hope and wait as
we look forward to the completion that will be given to us in the future.
c. The two disciples’
“redemption” and our “hope” today
The two
disciples on the road to Emmaus became disappointed because they hoped only for
an earthly redemption in which the immediate Roman oppression—their external
circumstances—would be removed.
However, the
true attitude of faith that modern Christians should possess is this: “Firmly
believing (Faith) in the grace of the forgiveness of sins that was completed in
the past, earnestly hoping (Hope) for the redemption of the body that will be
completed in the future, and overcoming the refining trials of the present.” When this direction is firmly established, we
can rise again without collapsing into spiritual disappointment before any
deficiency or suffering in our present circumstances (Internet).
(3) Third, after separately
meditating on the words spoken concerning the two disciples on the road to
Emmaus who were engaged in a conversation of sorrow and disappointment—“Jesus
Himself drew near and went with them” [αὐτὸς ὁ Ἰησοῦς ἐγγίσας συνεπορεύετο αὐτοῖς
(autos ho Iēsous engisas syneporeueto autois)] (Lk. 24:15), and “They drew near
to the village where they were going, and He acted as though He would go
farther” [ἤγγισαν εἰς τὴν κώμην οὗ ἐπορεύοντο, καὶ αὐτὸς προσεποιεῖτο
πορρώτερον πορεύεσθαι (ēngisan eis tēn kōmēn hou eporeuonto, kai autos
prosepoieito porrōteron poreuesthai)] (v. 28)—I want to meditate on what kind
of Lord our Lord is and on His heart by considering the relationship between
these two statements.
(a) The Lord who “draws near and walks with them” in verse 15 and the
Lord who “acts as though He would go farther” in verse 28 may appear
contradictory on the surface. However,
when we connect these two verses through the nuances of the original Greek, we
can discover the deep heart of the Lord, who desires the disciples’ personal
decision and intimacy with Him—a love that is somewhat like a divine game of
hide-and-seek (Internet):
1. Verse
15: The Lord who first comes to us and remains by our side
The depth of
the original language: συνεπορεύετο (syneporeueto) is the imperfect form of a
verb meaning “to travel together,” conveying the sense that “He continued
walking alongside them, side by side.”
The heart of
the Lord: Even while the disciples failed to recognize the Lord and poured out
words of despair, the Lord did not become angry or leave them. Instead, He quietly remained beside them,
adjusting His pace to theirs. He is the
Lord of unconditional love who first comes to us and walks with us at our pace
when we are discouraged and overwhelmed by spiritual disappointment.
2. Verse 28: The Lord who waits for a personal
invitation
The depth of
the original language: προσεποιεῖτο (prosepoieito) is an imperfect form meaning
“to pretend, to act as though.” In other words, Jesus did not truly intend to
abandon the disciples and leave them; rather, “He acted as though He were going
farther.”
The heart of
the Lord: The Lord does not force His presence upon us. When the disciples’ hearts had begun to burn
as they listened to the Word, He waited for them, by their own free will and
personal decision, to hold on to Him and invite Him to stay. If the disciples
had not urged the Lord to remain with them at that point, He would have
continued on His way. The Lord desires
our personal confession and voluntary love.
3. The relationship between the
two statements: “The Lord who brings a personal relationship to completion”
When these
two verses are connected, the heart of the Lord unfolds into one beautiful
story of love.
The
initiative in salvation belongs to the Lord (v. 15), but the completion of
intimacy takes place through our invitation (v. 28).
The Lord who
first approached us (v. 15) does not forcefully break down the door of our
hearts and enter. Instead, He acts as though He would go farther (v. 28),
waiting for us to open the door and say, “Lord, the day is nearly over; stay
with us.”
Ultimately,
Jesus’ action in verse 28 of “acting as though He would go farther” was the
Lord’s holy way of drawing out the passion hidden in the disciples’ hearts and
their longing for Him (Internet).
(i) Here, as I meditated on
the meaning of the word συνεπορεύετο (syneporeueto), “went with them” (v.
15)—that is, “He continued walking alongside them, side by side”—I thought of
the Holy Spirit, the “Helper” [Παράκλητος (Paraklētos)]. What relationship is there between these two
concepts for us, the modern-day disciples of Jesus?
·
The
συνεπορεύετο (syneporeueto, “to walk alongside together”) of verse 15 and the
Παράκλητος (Paraklētos, “Helper”) found in the Gospel of John form a pair that
corresponds powerfully on a conceptual and spatial level. The relationship between these two words gives
modern Christians—the disciples of Jesus living today—profound spiritual
comfort and a powerful sense of identity (Internet):
a. The linguistic and spatial
relationship between the two words: “The companion beside me”
Both words share the central spatial idea of being “with/beside” (para /
syn).
συνεπορεύετο
(syneporeueto): This word is formed from σύν (syn, “with”) + πορεύομαι
(poreuomai, “to go, travel”). It dynamically conveys the idea of “walking
alongside someone, matching one’s steps with theirs.”
Παράκλητος
(Paraklētos): This word is associated with παρά (para, “beside”) + καλέω
(kaleō, “to call”). It carries the sense of “one called alongside” to help a
person in difficulty and can refer to an advocate, comforter, or helper.
The heart of
the connection: The physical presence of the risen Jesus, who walked side by
side with the disciples on the road to Emmaus (syneporeueto), continues for us
today as the spiritual presence of the Holy Spirit, who remains with us forever
as the Paraklētos.
b. Three spiritual meanings for modern disciples
① A “real companionship” even when He cannot be seen
The Emmaus
disciples’ eyes were restrained so that they could not recognize that Jesus was
beside them, yet Jesus was unquestionably walking alongside them.
Today, we
too often become lonely in the midst of suffering and spiritual depression,
saying, “It feels as though God is not here.” Yet regardless of our feelings, the Holy
Spirit, the Paraklētos, is even now quietly walking beside us, matching His
steps to the pace of our lives.
② The ministry of the Paraklētos who “opens the Scriptures and causes our
hearts to burn”
When Jesus
opened the Old Testament Scriptures to the disciples on the road, their hearts
burned within them. In John 14:26, Jesus said that when the Holy Spirit, the
Paraklētos, comes, He “will bring to your remembrance all things that I said to
you.”
When we read
the Word, listen to a sermon, or suddenly remember a word of promise in the
midst of suffering and our hearts begin to burn, this is evidence that the Holy
Spirit, the Paraklētos beside us, is opening the Scriptures to us just as Jesus
did on the road to Emmaus.
③ The advocacy that transforms “micro-level despair” into “macro-level
hope”
The
Paraklētos is the One who advocates for, encourages, and raises up those who
are discouraged. Just as Jesus turned
around the disciples who were heading home in micro-level despair, saying, “We
had hoped that He was the One who would redeem Israel,” the Holy Spirit today
knows our circumstances better than anyone else, intercedes for us with
groanings too deep for words (Rom. 8:26), and continually directs our eyes
toward “the redemption of our body that is to come”—macro-level salvation.
In summary,
If Jesus on
the road to Emmaus walked alongside His disciples in the flesh as a “Paraklētos
within time and space,” today the Holy Spirit transcends time and space and
eternally walks alongside each and every modern disciple as the “indwelling
Paraklētos.
(4) Fourth, I want to receive the
rebuke and instruction given to us as I meditate on the words Jesus spoke to
the two disciples on the road to Emmaus, whose eyes were restrained so that
they could not recognize that Jesus was beside them, walking side by side with
them: “O foolish ones, and slow of heart to believe in all that the prophets
have spoken! Was it not necessary that
the Christ should suffer these things and enter into His glory?” [ὦ ἀνόητοι καὶ
βραδεῖς τῇ καρδίᾳ τοῦ πιστεύειν ἐπὶ πᾶσιν οἷς ἐλάλησαν οἱ προφῆται· οὐχὶ ταῦτα ἔδει
παθεῖν τὸν χριστὸν καὶ εἰσελθεῖν εἰς τὴν δόξαν αὐτοῦ (ō anoētoi kai bradeis tē
kardia tou pisteuein epi pasin hois elalēsan hoi prophētai; ouchi tauta edei
pathein ton Christon kai eiselthein eis tēn doxan autou?)] (Lk. 24:25–26), and,
“And beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, He explained to them in detail
the things concerning Himself in all the Scriptures” [ἀρξάμενος ἀπὸ Μωϋσέως καὶ
ἀπὸ πάντων τῶν προφητῶν διερμήνευσεν αὐτοῖς ἐν πάσαις ταῖς γραφαῖς τὰ περὶ ἑαυτοῦ
(arxamenos apo Mōyseōs kai apo pantōn tōn prophētōn diermēneusen autois en
pasais tais graphais ta peri heautou)] (v. 27).
1. The
Lord’s rebuke: “Dullness of understanding and sluggishness of heart”
Jesus rebuked the disciples primarily for two
things:
“O foolish ones” (ἀνόητοι — anoētoi)
This word
does not simply mean having a low IQ. Rather,
it refers to the condition of being “unwilling to use one’s understanding,
lacking spiritual discernment.” The
disciples had seen with their own eyes the events that had taken place in
Jerusalem and had also heard the women’s testimony concerning the resurrection
(vv. 22–24), yet they had completely failed to use the “spiritual intelligence”
necessary to connect and interpret these events spiritually. For this, the Lord rebuked them.
“Slow of heart to believe” (βραδεῖς τῇ καρδίᾳ τοῦ
πιστεύειν — bradeis tē kardia...)
βραδεῖς
(bradeis) means “slow, sluggish, dull.” In other words, the rebuke was that
their hearts were “far too sluggish and dull when it came to believing.” They may have known intellectually the
prophecies of the prophets—the Old Testament Scriptures—but their hearts were
far too slow and sluggish to respond by receiving those words as truth for
their own lives and trusting them.
The rebuke
for us today: We, too, may possess a great deal of biblical knowledge, but when
we actually encounter crises and despair in life—our own Emmaus road—we must
examine ourselves to see whether we are spiritually ignorant and sluggish when
it comes to applying that Word to our own circumstances and believing it.
2. The
necessary principle of salvation: “To suffer and enter into glory”
“Was it not necessary?” (οὐχὶ ταῦτα ἔδει παθεῖν...
— ouchi tauta edei pathein...)
The key word
in verse 26 is ἔδει (edei). It expresses Divine Necessity—“it had to be so,” or
“it was necessary.”
The
Messiah’s suffering on the cross was not a “failure” that He helplessly endured
because He was overpowered by the Roman Empire. Rather, it was God’s thorough and necessary
plan of salvation, established in Scripture from before the foundation of the
world for the salvation of humanity.
The order of
suffering and glory: The Lord declares that only by passing through suffering
(παθεῖν) could He enter into His glory (δόξαν). There is no glory without suffering.
The lesson
for us today: The disciples were disappointed at the cross because they sought
only “political glory without suffering.” The Lord also asks us, “Was it not necessary
that the Christ should suffer these things and enter into His glory?” and
teaches us that the refining trials and sufferings that come into our lives are
also a necessary process through which we move toward the glory of God.
3. The
Lord’s instruction—the solution: “Interpreting the Lord solely through
Scripture”
“He explained in detail” (διερμήνευσεν —
diermēneusen)
This word
means “to translate, interpret, explain deeply.” (It is related to the term
used today, “hermeneutics.”) Jesus did not simply offer emotional comfort or
perform a visible miracle. Instead,
taking Moses and the Prophets—the entire Old Testament Scriptures—as His text,
He perfectly interpreted their meaning through the lens of “Jesus Christ.”
The
destination of Scripture: τὰ περὶ ἑαυτοῦ (ta peri heautou), that is, He
explained that all the writings of Scripture ultimately concerned “Himself.” He interpreted for them the fact that the
destination toward which all the sacrifices, the tabernacle, and the prophecies
of the prophets from Genesis through Malachi pointed was the suffering and
resurrection of Jesus.
The lesson
for us today: The only prescription for healing our ignorance and spiritual
disappointment is to return to a “Bible-centered faith.” When we stop interpreting our circumstances
according to our emotions or the standards of the world and instead interpret
our lives through “the gospel of Jesus Christ,” which runs throughout the
entire Old and New Testaments, only then do our veiled eyes begin to be opened
(Internet).
(5) Fifth, I want to reflect upon
and apply to ourselves the words concerning Jesus while He was staying with the
two disciples: “Now it came to pass, as He sat at the table with them, that He
took the bread, blessed it, broke it, and gave it to them. Then their eyes were opened, and they
recognized Him” [ἐγένετο ἐν τῷ κατακλιθῆναι αὐτὸν μετ’ αὐτῶν, λαβὼν τὸν ἄρτον εὐλόγησεν
καὶ κλάσας ἐπεδίδου αὐτοῖς· αὐτῶν δὲ διηνοίχθησαν οἱ ὀφθαλμοὶ καὶ ἐπέγνωσαν αὐτόν
(egeneto en tō kataklithēnai auton met’ autōn, labōn ton arton eulogēsen kai
klasas epedidou autois; autōn de diēnoichthēsan hoi ophthalmoi kai epegnōsan
auton)] (Lk. 24:30–31).
1. The
reversal of host and guest: Surrendering the sovereignty of my life
The nuance
of the original language: When the meal was prepared because of the disciples’
earnest invitation, Jesus, who had originally entered as the guest, instead
assumed the role of the host—the Lord—by “taking” [λαβὼν (labōn)], “blessing”
[εὐλόγησεν (eulogēsen)], and “breaking” [κλάσας (klasas)] the bread and giving
it to them. This sequence of actions
immediately recalls both the Lord’s Supper instituted by Jesus (Mt. 26:26) and
the miracle of the five loaves and two fish (Lk. 9:16).
Our
reflection and application: We often invite Jesus as “a guest who will meet the
needs of my life.” But the moment when
our spiritual eyes are opened is when Jesus takes the place of the Master at
the table of our lives, personally takes the bread of our lives into His hands,
blesses it, and breaks it. Only when we
completely surrender the sovereignty and steering wheel of our lives to the
Lord do we begin to experience the reality that the Lord is alive.
2. The opening of veiled eyes: Sacramental
presence and the restoration of worship
The nuance
of the original language: διηνοίχθησαν (diēnoichthēsan), “were opened,” is a
passive form of the verb meaning “to open.” In other words, the disciples did not see
through their own human effort or physical eyesight; rather, their spiritual
eyes “were opened by God.” It is a
divine passive. As a result, they moved beyond merely knowing about the Lord
and reached the level of ἐπέγνωσαν (epegnōsan), “to recognize fully/deeply.”
Our
reflection and application: If the disciples’ hearts burned through the “Word
(Bible study)” of verse 27, their eyes were completely opened through the “breaking
of bread (the Lord’s Supper/worship)” in verses 30–31. For us today, this points to the place of
worship and Communion. When the Holy
Spirit opens our spiritual eyes through the Word proclaimed week after week and
through the fellowship of breaking bread—Communion and the fellowship of the
saints—we come fully to encounter [ἐπέγνωσαν (epegnōsan), “to recognize
fully/deeply”] not an abstract Jesus existing merely in our ideas, but “the
real Jesus who has risen and is now present with me.”
3. The spiritual meaning of the
“bread that is broken and given”: Discovering the marks of the cross
The nuance
of the original language: Jesus took the bread and, κλάσας (klasas), “broke” it
and gave it to the disciples. At the
very moment the bread was torn apart, the disciples may finally have recognized
the agonizing love of Jesus, who only days earlier had given His own body to be
torn on the cross in Jerusalem as the Bread of Life, along with the marks of
the nails from the cross.
Our
reflection and application: There are moments when, because of refining trials
and suffering, the places and plans of our lives are “torn and broken” [κλάσας
(klasas)]. When we are trapped within
micro-level salvation, we despair when our lives are broken. But when our eyes are opened to macro-level
salvation, we realize that the very moment our lives are torn can instead
become a channel of grace through which, united with the Lord’s suffering on
the cross, we encounter the risen Lord most clearly.
Comprehensive summary of today’s meditation:
The secret
of the Emmaus disciples’ spiritual eyes being opened was that they welcomed the
Lord as the “Master” of their lives and received and ate the “Bread of Life—the
gospel of the cross” that He gave them. Likewise, when we entrust the sovereignty of
our lives to the Lord in our daily lives and worship, our veiled eyes will be
opened, and we will experience the miracle of recognizing the Lord who is
beside us (Internet).
(6) Sixth, I want to receive the lesson given to us as I meditate on
what the two disciples on the road to Emmaus said to one another: “Did not our
hearts burn within us while He spoke to us on the road and opened the
Scriptures to us?” [Οὐχὶ ἡ καρδία ἡμῶν καιομένη ἦν ἐν ἡμῖν ὡς ἐλάλει ἡμῖν ἐν τῇ
ὁδῷ, ὡς διήνοιγεν ἡμῖν τὰς γραφάς (ouchi hē kardia hēmōn kaiomenē ēn en hēmin
hōs elalei hēmin en tē hodō, hōs diēnoigen hēmin tas graphas?)] (Lk. 24:32).
1. Inner
revival produced by the Holy Spirit and the Word: “A heart that continues to
burn”
The depth of
the original language: καιομένη ἦν (kaiomenē ēn) combines the present
participle καιομένη, meaning “burning,” with the imperfect verb ἦν. Thus, it does not describe an emotion that
suddenly flared up for a moment and then disappeared. Rather, it means “a state in which the flame
continued to burn intensely and unceasingly within their hearts throughout the
entire time they were hearing the Word.”
Lesson and
reflection: Genuine restoration—or revival—of faith does not come from external
stimulation or an emotional atmosphere. It
occurs only when the text of the gospel strikes the heart. Modern disciples should not become obsessed
with emotional comfort or temporary spiritual excitement; rather, we should
seek the work of the Holy Spirit through which the flame of the Word continues
to burn within us without being extinguished.
2. The
gospel that breaks open our veiled and closed framework: “Opening the
Scriptures wide”
The depth of
the original language: διήνοιγεν (diēnoigen) is an imperfect verb meaning “to
open, to open up.” It comes from the
same root as the word used in verse 31 when the disciples’ closed eyes were
opened (διηνοίχθησαν). Jesus threw open the doors of the disciples’ confined
thinking and the closed doors of the Scriptures.
Lesson and
reflection: The disciples despaired because they had kept Scripture closed
within their own interpretive standard—political salvation. Only when the Lord opened the Scriptures and
interpreted them according to the macro-level salvation that runs through the
suffering and glory of Christ did their hearts begin to burn. Likewise, rather than interpreting our lives
according to our own way, we must receive the grace by which the Holy Spirit
opens our understanding and the Scriptures so that we may see life from the
perspective of God’s vast work of salvation.
3. The
presence experienced in the journey of everyday life: “The work He performs on
the road”
The depth of
the original language: The disciples remembered the time when the Lord had
spoken to them “on the road” [ἐν τῇ ὁδῷ (en tē hodō)]. It was not in a holy temple or at a special
religious gathering. Rather, the utterly
ordinary and secular road along which they were trudging home in despair became
the very place of revival where their hearts burned within them.
Lesson and
reflection: For modern disciples today, the “road” (ὁδός) is the ordinary
setting of daily life—the workplace, the home, and the places where we carry
out our daily responsibilities. The
risen Lord comes beside us not only when we are in religious spaces, but also
in the everyday journey of life, when we are discouraged and talking in the
midst of ordinary circumstances, and He still transforms our hearts so that
they burn within us (Internet).
(a) Here, Jeremiah 23:29 came to mind: “Is not My word like fire,”
declares the LORD, “and like a hammer that breaks the rock in pieces?” I also
thought of hymn No. 184 in the New Korean Hymnal, “Holy Spirit, Like a Flame.”
I will share only the first verse and the refrain: (Verse 1) Holy Spirit, like
a flame, come now upon us who pray; descend upon us now and show us Your glory.
(Refrain) Holy Spirit, come upon us and
satisfy the longing of our spirits. As we wait for You, fill us with fire, with
fire. Amen.
a. The hammer that breaks the
rock: The Word that breaks the hardened frameworks of the human heart
Connection
with the Word: In Jeremiah 23:29, God’s Word is described as “a hammer that
breaks the rock in pieces.” For the
disciples on the road to Emmaus, this hammer was the Lord’s rebuke and His
exposition of Scripture, which shattered the hard rock of the “political and
micro-level view of the Messiah” to which they had stubbornly clung.
Our
reflection: Within us, too, there are hard rocks consisting of our own
interests, worldly success, and human standards of salvation. When the fire of the Holy Spirit comes upon
us, the first thing that happens is “the work of repentance and confession,” in
which our self-centered stubbornness and prejudices are shattered into pieces. Only when the rock is broken can the seed of
the true gospel finally be planted.
b. The
Holy Spirit like fire: The fire that consumes and purifies the heart
Connection
with the Word: Jeremiah’s declaration, “Is not My word like fire?” and the
hymn’s words, “Holy Spirit, like a flame,” point to the same spiritual quality.
Fire burns away everything impure and
leaves only pure gold. The “burning”
that the disciples experienced on the road was not merely emotional excitement;
it was the purifying work of the Holy Spirit consuming the residue of despair,
fear, and doubt that had filled their hearts.
Our
reflection: The fullness of the Holy Spirit that modern disciples should seek
is not power with which to display ourselves, but fire that burns away the
impurities within us—anxiety, lust, and spiritual laziness. When the fire of the Holy Spirit takes hold of
our souls, the fears given by the world disappear, and a pure hope that looks
only toward the glory of the Lord begins to burn within us.
c. The
Holy Spirit who satisfies the longing of our spirits (the hymn refrain)
Connection
with the Word: The refrain of the hymn sings, “Satisfy the longing of our
spirits.” At first, the Emmaus disciples
despaired because their “fleshly desire—liberation from Rome” had been
frustrated. But when the Lord opened the
Scriptures to them and the fire of the Holy Spirit came upon them, their “spiritual
longing—God’s eternal reign and the redemption of the body” was awakened, and
they received incomparable spiritual satisfaction.
Our
reflection: The satisfaction of the world is temporary and leaves us thirsty
again. But when we wait and pray, “Fill
us with fire, with fire,” the Holy Spirit awakens within us the “longing of the
spirit” that reaches beyond our fleshly desires and longs for the kingdom of
God, and within that longing He gives us the most complete peace and
satisfaction (Internet).
(7) Seventh and last, I want to receive the lesson given to us as I
meditate on the words: “So they rose up that very hour and returned to
Jerusalem, and found the eleven and those who were with them gathered together,
saying, ‘The Lord is risen indeed, and has appeared to Simon!’ And the two also told what had happened on the
road, and how Jesus had become known to them in the breaking of bread” (Lk.
24:33–35).
(a) These words are the great conclusion of the Emmaus story: the
disciples who had left Jerusalem in despair encountered the risen Lord and
afterward recovered both their mission and their community. The central
meanings and lessons of these words are as follows (Internet):
1. Immediate turning back and
restoration of mission (“They rose up that very hour and returned to
Jerusalem”)
Meaning: Once
the disciples’ eyes were opened and their hearts began to burn, even though evening
had fallen and the night had grown dark, they did not hesitate. They “immediately” [ἀναστάντες αὐτῇ τῇ ὥρᾳ
(anastantes autē tē hōra), “rising up that very hour”] got up and returned to
Jerusalem. Only a few hours earlier,
Jerusalem had been the place of despair and fear where Jesus had been
executed—the very place from which they themselves had fled.
Lesson: When
we personally encounter the risen Lord, our fear of circumstances disappears. The Lord calls us to make a decision of faith:
to turn around from the direction in which we were descending in discouragement
and immediately return to “my Jerusalem,” the place of mission and the place
where we are called to be witnesses.
2. The joy of the resurrection confirmed within
the community (“They were gathered together... saying that He had appeared to
Simon”)
Meaning: When
the two disciples returned to Jerusalem, they met the eleven apostles and their
companions who had gathered together, and there they heard the community’s
confession: “The Lord has indeed risen and has appeared to Peter (Simon)!”
Lesson: Resurrection
faith is not something we keep to ourselves. It becomes even more firmly established when
it is shared and confirmed together within the community of faith—the church.
When the fire of the Holy Spirit that has come upon me meets the evidence of
the resurrection that has come to another person, the entire community
experiences great assurance and spiritual revival.
3. Testifying to the Lord whom we
encountered in everyday life (“They told what had happened on the road and...
how He was known to them”)
Meaning: The
two disciples also poured out before the community their vivid testimony: the
overwhelming experience of having the Scriptures explained to them “on the
road,” and how they recognized the Lord at the table “when He broke the bread.”
Lesson: A
true disciple is a person who is not ashamed to testify about the Jesus whom he
or she has encountered. We must become “witnesses
of the gospel” who tell our neighbors and brothers and sisters, in the actual
settings of life, about the grace of the Holy Spirit, the Paraklētos, who
walked alongside us on the road of our lives, and about the miracle of our eyes
being opened when we surrendered the sovereignty of our lives to the Lord (Internet).
댓글
댓글 쓰기