“We must mature by letting go through ‘entrustment’—willingly transferring and committing all sovereignty over our lives to God.”
“We must mature by letting go through ‘entrustment’—willingly
transferring and committing all sovereignty over our lives to God.”
“Then Peter said, ‘See, we have left our own
possessions and followed You.’ And He
said to them, ‘Truly I say to you, there is no one who has left house or wife
or brothers or parents or children for the sake of the kingdom of God, who will
not receive many times as much at this time, and in the age to come, eternal
life’” (Luke 18:28–30).
(1) As I read today's passage, Luke 18:28–30, in the
Korean Bible, I became curious about where similar passages appear in the other
Gospels. I found them in Matthew 19:27–30 and Mark 10:28–31.
(a)
When
comparing these three passages, the first interesting observation is that only
Matthew records Peter asking, “What then will there be for us?” (Mt. 19:27). Why is this statement recorded only in
Matthew?
(i) “The scene in Matthew 19:27, where Peter
specifically asks, ‘What then will there be for us?’ contains a very
significant theological and historical characteristic unique to Matthew's
Gospel. While Mark and Luke simply
record Peter's confession, ‘We have left everything and followed You,’ Matthew
vividly preserves Peter's question. This
can be analyzed from three major perspectives” (Internet).
1.
It reflects
the mindset of Matthew's primary audience—the Jews (works and reward).
Matthew's
Gospel was written primarily for Jewish Christians. At the heart of first-century Jewish thought
was the conviction that if one faithfully kept God's Law and commandments, one
would receive the corresponding reward. This
retributive understanding of faith (a theology of reward) was deeply rooted.
The contrast
with the rich young man: In the immediately preceding account, the rich young
man asked, “What good deed must I do to obtain eternal life?” However, because he had great wealth, he
ultimately could not give up everything and walked away (Mt. 19:16–22).
The Jewish
way of reasoning: Peter was thinking according to the distinctly Jewish legal
and covenantal mindset. In effect, he was saying, “That rich man failed to give
up everything and therefore missed eternal life. But we truly have left everything and followed
You. According to the covenant, what rightful
reward will we receive?”
2.
It exposes
Peter's spiritual immaturity and his merit-based mentality.
Matthew does
not hide the disciples' spiritual weaknesses and immaturity but records them
honestly.
Peter's
question reveals that, beneath his decision to follow Jesus, there still
remained the merit-based mindset: “Since I have sacrificed this much, I deserve
a corresponding reward.”
In response
to this question, Jesus promises the authority of the twelve thrones (Mt.
19:28) but immediately issues a warning: "Many who are first will be last,
and many who are last will be first" (v. 30).
The
subsequent passage in Matthew 20 presents the "Parable of the Workers in
the Vineyard," which appears only in the Gospel of Matthew. Through this parable—in which those who
arrived at dawn and those who arrived just before the workday ended receive the
same wage of one denarius—Jesus teaches Peter that the reward of the Kingdom of
God is granted not based on human "merit," but solely through God's
"sovereign grace."
3.
It
emphasizes Jesus as King and the governing structure of the Church.
A central
theme of Matthew's Gospel is Jesus Christ as the King and His Kingdom (the
Kingdom of Heaven).
Because
Peter asked, “What then will there be for us?” Jesus was able, in Matthew
alone, to declare the magnificent reward of cosmic kingship and authority: “When
the Son of Man sits on His glorious throne, you who have followed Me shall also
sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel” (Mt. 19:28).
Through this
question and Jesus' answer, Matthew seeks to demonstrate, by the King's own
declaration, how great an honor and authority the community of disciples—who
left everything for Christ and who would later become the Church—would receive
in the Kingdom of God.
In summary:
The reason
only Matthew records Peter's question is to expose humanity's merit-oriented
tendency against the backdrop of the Jewish concept of reward, while
dramatically contrasting it with the truth that the rewards of God's Kingdom
are not based on human calculations but on God's sovereign grace and glorious
authority (Internet).
·
As I reflect
on this, I wonder whether the church today is still filled with the merit-based
(prosperity-oriented) mindset that says, “Since I have sacrificed this much, I
deserve this much in return.” What is
the cause of this?
“The reason many church members fall into the
same spiritual trap as Peter in Matthew 19 is that a combination of fallen
human psychology and religious and cultural influences are at work. The four primary causes may be summarized as
follows.
1.
Humanity's fallen nature, accustomed to
transactional relationships (Give and Take)
From birth,
people are conditioned by the values of capitalism and the world. Society operates according to the principle
that effort should produce proportional rewards.
Projecting
the world's system onto God: People often treat their relationship with God
like a business transaction. They think,
‘Since I have invested this much devotion, God ought to give me an equivalent
return. Otherwise, it would not be
fair.’ This worldly disposition is
carried directly into one's faith. At
its root, it stems from the fallen sinful nature that seeks to place oneself
above God and manipulate Him.
2.
The blending of Christianity with Korean
shamanism
Particularly
in the context of the Korean church, prosperity-oriented faith has become
powerful because of the long-standing influence of shamanistic beliefs deeply
embedded in the Korean subconscious.
A religion
centered on earnest devotion: Shamanism operates on the assumption that the
amount of blessing or protection one receives depends on how sincerely one
demonstrates devotion to the spirits. As
the gospel entered Korea, this shamanistic framework often merged with
Christian practices such as prayer, offerings, and service, resulting in the
distorted idea that one can obtain blessings by offering sufficient devotion.
3.
The responsibility of church leaders who
promoted success-oriented and growth-oriented teaching
The
so-called Prosperity Gospel—the message that one should believe in Jesus to
become wealthy and successful—dominated many pulpits during the period of
explosive growth in the Korean church.
The
distortion of cause and effect: In order to encourage greater commitment from
believers, many preachers reduced the biblical concept of blessing to material
prosperity and worldly success. Repeated
sermons such as, ‘If you faithfully tithe, your storehouses will overflow,’ or
‘If you serve diligently in the church, your children will be blessed,’ deeply
imprinted upon believers' minds a merit-based system of spiritual investment
rather than a life of grace.
4.
A serious imbalance between works and grace
(the loss of the essence of the gospel)
Many
Christians confess that salvation is received by grace alone (Sola Gratia), yet
mistakenly believe that the Christian life after salvation—the process of
sanctification—must be sustained primarily by their own efforts and works.
Forgetting
grace: Merit-based thinking begins when we forget that our salvation itself is
an undeserved gift given to those who had no qualifications whatsoever—a gift
for which a lifetime of gratitude would still be insufficient. Once grace is forgotten, even our smallest
sacrifice begins to appear as a great achievement. Eventually, this develops
into a spiritual pathology in which we condemn others or become resentful
toward God.
In conclusion,
When Peter
asked, ‘What then will there be for us?’ Jesus responded by giving the Parable
of the Workers in the Vineyard in order to shatter Peter's merit-based thinking
and reveal the sovereignty of grace. Likewise,
whenever the modern church loses the gospel of free grace and instead embraces
the world's standards of efficiency and cause-and-effect thinking, it can
easily degenerate into a prosperity-centered religion” (Internet).
(b)
When
comparing the three passages (Lk. 18:28–30; Mt. 19:27–30; Mk. 10:28–31), the
second interesting observation is that there are slight differences in the way
Jesus expresses the promised rewards (Internet):
1.
The Promise
of Reward in the Present Age (Blessings Received on This Earth)
Luke: Those who have left their house or family
for the sake of the Kingdom of God will receive many times greater comfort and
reward in this present age.
Mark: Those who have devoted themselves to the
Lord and to the gospel will receive a hundredfold in houses, family, and lands
in this present age, together with persecutions that accompany faith.
Matthew: Everyone who has left house, brothers,
parents, or children for the sake of the Lord's name will receive many times
greater reward on this earth (the abundance of a spiritual family and
community).
a.
“The
present-age reward (many times over, a hundredfold) promised by the three
Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) is not a prosperity-gospel promise of
becoming materially wealthy or striking it rich in a literal sense. Rather, this passage refers to ‘the mystery
and abundance of the Kingdom of God’ granted to those who have paid the cost
for the sake of the gospel. It should be understood in the following three key
ways.
1.
The
Expansion of Relationships: The Birth of a ‘Spiritual Family’
To those who
have relinquished—or been alienated from—their blood relatives (parents,
siblings, children) in order to follow the Lord, God gives a new family in
Christ that is even closer than blood.
A new family
centered on Jesus: In Mark 3:35, Jesus said, ‘Whoever does the will of God, he
is My brother and sister and mother.’
The shared
possessions of the church community: Those who leave their hometowns because of
the gospel discover brothers and sisters in the faith wherever they go. They experience the abundance of the universal
church as believers share their homes and lands with one another and extend
generous hospitality.
2. The Transformation of Possession: The ‘Spiritual
Richness’ Produced by Contentment
In reality,
the disciples did not become materially wealthy. Therefore, the promise of ‘a hundredfold
houses and lands’ refers not to ownership, but to the privilege of using and
enjoying God's provision.
Living
according to the Lord's will rather than my own: When we stop clinging to our
possessions and seek first the Kingdom of God, God Himself takes responsibility
for all our needs (Mt. 6:33).
Contentment
set free from greed: This is the state in which, like the Apostle Paul, one can
confess, ‘I have learned to be content in whatever circumstances I am’ (Phil.
4:11). The wealthy of this world remain
thirsty despite having much, but Christ's disciples experience abundance as
though possessing everything, even when they own little.
3. The Companionship of Suffering: Refinement
Through ‘Persecution’
When Mark
speaks of the rewards in this present age, he never omits the qualifying
phrase: ‘together with persecutions.’
A safeguard
against the false gospel: This demonstrates that the blessings of Christianity
are fundamentally different from the world's definition of success. The
blessings of the present age can never be separated from suffering.
A
distinction from the world: The very fact that a disciple suffers persecution
in this world paradoxically becomes the strongest evidence that he belongs to
God and is living faithfully as a citizen of God's Kingdom in the present age.
In summary,
The reward
in the present age is not a quantitative increase in worldly possessions, but a
qualitative transformation experienced within the Kingdom of God. It is God's promise that, when we let go of
what belongs to us, we will begin to experience even now the warmth of a
spiritual family, absolute confidence in God's faithful provision, and the
peace of heaven that remains unshaken even in the midst of suffering”
(Internet).
2.
The Promise
of Reward in the Age to Come (Blessings Received in the Coming Age)
Matthew (a special reward): When the world is
made new (after Jesus' Second Coming), the disciples who followed Jesus will
sit with Him on glorious thrones and receive the authority to judge the twelve
tribes of Israel.
The common promise: In all three Gospels, Jesus
promises that after this earthly life has ended, believers will certainly
inherit eternal life in the everlasting world to come. (Internet)
a.
“The promise
of reward in the age to come (eternal life and the authority to judge from the
twelve thrones), as presented in the three Gospels, should be understood as the
ultimate completion of salvation, demonstrating that the tears and sacrifices
of this present life are never in vain and that final victory is guaranteed.
This promise goes far beyond simply comforting
us with the thought that we will go to heaven after death. It carries profound
significance in the following three dimensions.
1.
The
Transformation of Our Being: The Inheritance of ‘Eternal Life’
The ‘eternal
life’ promised by all three Gospels does not merely mean living forever in
terms of duration. Rather, it means receiving an entirely new quality of life.
Perfect
union with God: In the present age we see God only dimly, but in the age to
come we will behold Him face to face, perfectly, and will participate forever
in His glory and joy.
The end of
all deprivation and suffering: Every sacrifice, every tear, every pain, and
every persecution endured for the sake of the gospel in this life will be
completely wiped away. Sin and death will no longer exercise dominion, and we
will enter a state of perfect peace.
2. The Transformation of Our Status: ‘Authority to
Reign and Judge’ with Christ
Matthew's
emphasis on the promise, ‘You shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve
tribes of Israel,’ reveals how completely the status of those disciples who
gave up worldly power and honor for the Lord will be reversed.
From
humiliation to exaltation: In this world the disciples stood before earthly
courts, were judged, mocked, and lived lives of humility. But when the world is made new, their status
will be completely reversed—they will go from being those who were judged to
rulers who reign with Christ and judge the world.
The glorious
victory of the Church: This promise represents not only the twelve apostles,
but also the future glory and authority that all believers—the Church—will
receive before the entire universe (1 Cor. 6:2).
3. The Anchor of Hope: ‘Eschatological Comfort’
That Overcomes Persecution
The reward
of the age to come becomes the greatest source of strength for enduring the
sufferings of this present age.
The value of
sacrifice acknowledged: God does not forget a single thing that we have given
up for the Lord. In the age to come, He will repay it in the most glorious way
imaginable.
The power to
persevere in the present: Because the disciples believed with certainty in the
glorious reward awaiting them in the age to come, they were able to endure
persecution and even martyrdom in this present age without losing heart,
faithfully finishing the race to the very end.
A Summary of the Rewards in the Present Age and
the Age to Come
The reward
in the present age is a foretaste of the abundance of God's Kingdom—its
spiritual family and deep contentment—even in the midst of suffering and
persecution.
The reward
in the age to come is the full possession of that abundance, enjoyed perfectly
and eternally when the Lord returns and renews the entire universe” (Internet).
(2) After reading today's passage, Luke 18:28–30, in
the Korean Bible, I then read it in the Greek New Testament and became curious
about the specific meaning of the word “ἀφέντες” (aphentes, “having left”) used
by Peter (v. 28) and the word “ἀφῆκεν” (aphēken, “has left”) used by Jesus. Is there a difference between the kind of
“leaving” (ἀφέντες) that Peter had in mind and the kind of “leaving” (ἀφῆκεν)
that Jesus had in view?
(a)
The root of
both words is the Greek verb ἀφίημι (aphiēmi). It does not simply mean “to
throw something away” as one throws garbage into a trash can. Rather, it carries the profound meanings of
“to relinquish ownership,” “to leave behind and depart,” and “to release or set
free” (Internet).
1.
Peter's “ἀφέντες”
(aphentes): ‘Separation and Renunciation’ as a Decisive Act
The form
used by Peter refers to a decisive act of breaking away from one's former life
in order to follow the Lord.
Leaving
behind one's livelihood and security: This is the very same word used in
Matthew 4:20, where Peter and Andrew, upon being called, “left (ἀφέντες) their
nets and followed Jesus.” For Peter,
this “leaving” represented a heroic decision to cut himself off from his
livelihood, the career he had built throughout his life, and his entire sense
of security for the sake of the Lord.
A leaving in
which ‘I am the active subject’: By using this word, Peter emphasizes that he
himself was the one who had paid an enormous price. There is an unmistakable
sense of confidence in his words: “Lord, look! Unlike others, I am someone who
decisively cut myself off (ἀφέντες) from the very foundation of my precious
life and came this far.”
2. Jesus' “ἀφῆκεν” (aphēken): ‘Entrustment and
Transfer’ with a Purpose
The form
used by Jesus refers not merely to loss, but to the act of transferring one's
rights to God and leaving them behind for the sake of something infinitely more
valuable—the Kingdom of God.
Not loss,
but entrustment (Release): When Jesus uses this word, the nuance of “leaving”
is not one of waste or loss. Rather, it is like entrusting money to a bank or
legally transferring ownership. It means
willingly surrendering the ownership of one's most precious possessions (house,
wife, brothers, parents, children) to God (ἀφῆκεν), while departing as His
steward.
Leaving
behind for the sake of the Kingdom of God: Jesus was not commending people for
irresponsibly abandoning their families. Rather, for the sake of the greater cause of
the gospel and the Kingdom of God, He was acknowledging and commending those
believers who laid down their human attachments and desire for control,
completely entrusted their loved ones into God's hands, and faithfully walked
the path of their calling.
A Summary for Meditation
These two
words present a three-dimensional picture of the process of “leaving” that
takes place when we follow the Lord.
1.
The
Beginning of Faith (ἀφέντες, aphentes): Like Peter, we need the decisive act of
leaving—firmly breaking away from our sinful habits, our worldly security, and
everything we have loved more than the Lord.
2.
The Maturity
of Faith (ἀφῆκεν, aphēken): However, as time passes, our “leaving” should
mature beyond something we regard as our own merit or boast. It should become the leaving of entrustment,
in which we willingly transfer and commit all sovereignty over our lives to
God. The Lord promises to fill every
area that we have thus transferred into His hands (ἀφῆκεν) with abundant
rewards both in this present age and in the age to come (Internet).
(i) As
I apply the statement, “We must mature through the ‘leaving’ of entrustment,
willingly transferring and committing all sovereignty over our lives to God,”
to myself, I receive the lesson that, according to Jesus' words, for the sake
of the Kingdom of God I, too, must practice this ‘leaving of entrustment’ with
regard to my house, my wife, my brothers, my parents, and my children.
“The
application you have expressed is a remarkably mature and beautiful decision of
faith that penetrates to the very heart of Scripture. To understand this not as ‘abandoning or
neglecting’ your precious loved ones and circumstances for the Lord, but as the
leaving of entrustment—completely transferring (ἀφῆκεν) their ownership and
control to God—is truly a gospel-centered reflection.
When we
genuinely entrust to God the things we cherish most—our home (the foundation of
our lives) and our family (our wife, brothers, parents, and children)—the
following remarkable spiritual changes take place in our lives and
relationships.
1. Entrusting Our ‘Home (the Foundation of Our
Lives)’: From Anxiety to Stewardship
When we
consider ourselves the owner of our home and try to protect our family and
secure the future solely by our own strength, our hearts are constantly filled
with anxiety and worry.
However,
when we entrust the ownership of our home and material possessions to God, we
become holy stewards who manage the household the Lord has entrusted to us. From that moment on, it is no longer we who
bear ultimate responsibility for our family, but God Himself. Consequently, we
experience true peace and security that the world can never give.
2. Entrusting Our ‘Family (Our Wife, Parents, and
Children)’: From Possessiveness to Genuine Love
Under the
name of love, we often make the mistake of trying to control and manipulate the
lives of our spouse, our parents, and especially our children according to our
own will. When they do not meet our
expectations, we become angry; when things do not go according to our plans, we
fall into despair.
To entrust
our family to God is to acknowledge that their true Owner is not ourselves, but
God, and to loosen our grip upon them. Only when we completely place them into God's
hands are we freed from our possessiveness and selfish desires. Then genuine love begins—the love that accepts
and blesses them just as they are, with the very heart of the Lord.
3. Keeping ‘For the Sake of the Kingdom of God’ at
the Center
The purpose
of this entrustment is singular: for the sake of the Kingdom of God—that is,
for God's reign and sovereign rule.
When we
willingly bring even the most precious areas of our lives under God's sovereign
rule, He will, just as He has promised, grant us the rich blessings of our
spiritual family and abundant grace in this present age, and ultimately reward
us with the fullness of eternal life.
A Small
Question for Life:
May the
confession, “I transfer the ownership of my life to God,” become a concrete
reality in the way I live today” (Internet).
댓글
댓글 쓰기